counter create hit
Birthdays For The Dead

Stuart MacBride lives in the North East of Scotland, where he writes gruesome crime novels and grows gruesome potatoes.

Vote For Stuart - Million For A Morgue

Upcoming events
If you want to know what I'm up to, head on over to the diary page!

Friday, December 17, 2004

Swearing – not big, not clever…

And yet we all do it. Unless you’re some kind of saintly nun, living on Rich Tea Biscuits in a remote convent’s broom cupboard. John Rickards had a rant the other day about people who use the naughty language, but hide it behind coy asterisks. Which got me to thinking: as an occasional offender – and thus at risk from what’s swiftly becoming known as ‘Rickards’ F*****g Law’ – why do I use much, much filthier language when I write books than I would anywhere else? I mean, I have been known to let fly the odd torrent of abuse, but most of the time I’m pretty tame on the old vocabulary front.

When we were doing the line edits on Cold Granite – way back when – I asked if we should maybe cut back on some of the swearing. But Sarah, who is a lovely lady at HarperCollins and not prone to the ribald phrase, liked it just as it was. Lent a sense of realism. OK. I can live with that (in a smug, haven’t-I-been-a-good-boy kind of way) But after John’s stunning impersonation of a hairy Victor Meldrew, I went back to the final edit of the book and did a find and replace on every rude word I could think of at the time, adding up all the ‘Word had finished searching the docment and has made 126 replacements’s. Hmmm… five hundred and fifty five incidents of profanity (including your basic, entry-level blasphemy). Now that’s in a book of 127,733 words, or 0.435% for those of you with a pedantic bent. And I honestly can’t say whether or not this is a good, or a bad thing…

And if you are one of those pedants, here’s how those number’s breakdown. Those of you with a nervous disposition should look away now:


#Naughty WordTimes
#Naughty WordTimes
1.Bastard126
2.Fuck118
3.Shit85
4.God73
5.Arse56
6.Damn42
7.Christ32
8.Bugger22
9.'Lady's Front Bottom'*1
* Sorry, just too rude to write on the internet.

Anyone else looked back at the end of writing a book and though f**k me, my d*****ing language is h****ed worse than a g*****king-f****-monkey!?!

5 Comments:

At 1:21 am, Blogger John R. said...

"Rickards Fucking Law"...

Yeah, I like the sound of that. :-D

Despite the Meldrew comparison...

 
At 1:29 am, Blogger John R. said...

And incidentally, that post of mine contained 14 fucks (or variants) and 2 arses in just 528 words.

Or 3% profanity. I feel proud. :-)

 
At 1:47 am, Blogger Stuart MacBride said...

And quite right too. Three percent is a splendid size.

;}#

 
At 6:24 pm, Blogger JamesO said...

It's all bollocks, really. I had a friend at University called Stuart (no relation) who used the word 'fucking' as punctuation. He was quite unaware of it, a bit like the old Not the Nine O'clock News sketch (showing my age a bit here). I remember a time when my flatmat's sister was staying and we all went for a walk along the beach (we were such rebels back then). After a particularly ripe diatribe from Stuart, Olga (for that was her name) looked at him and said: 'Stuart, what do you say when you're really pissed off with something?'

He had no answer. Indeed he remained silent for the next half hour or so.

He got a first in engineering and the last I heard he was working his way up the management structure of an international firm of structural engineers. Which just goes to show that I know fuck all about anything.

 
At 10:50 pm, Blogger Aldo said...

All I can say is ....golly!

 
Post a Comment
Powered by Blogger